Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 So. 3d 280 - Taylor v. State

248 So. 3d 280 - Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 121 So. 3d 419 - Alcorn v. State · 857 So. 2d 861 - Wright v. State · 979 So. 2d 353 - Luckey v. State · Sophia L. Lamb v. State · Dieugrand Jacques v. State of Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because [appellant] had not previously sought or been given leave to amend his rule 3.850 motion, and because the pleading deficiency in his motion is likely correctable, he should be given the chance to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The failure to convey a favorable plea offer to a defendant in a criminal case can constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.