Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 SO3D 621 - State v. Lambert

State v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 441 So. 2d 732 - State v. Lynch · 661 So. 2d 442 - State v. Smith · Suwannee Swifty Stores, Inc. v. Georgia Lottery Corp. · 436 So. 2d 471 - State v. Sutton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Specific intent may be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the offense and the conduct of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.