Newberry v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1925
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bullock v. Sprowls · Searcy v. Hunter · Hughes v. Hughes · 27 Tex. Civ. App. 38 - Peck v. Cain
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““By the term ‘necessaries’ is not’ confined to merely such things as are required for a bare existence, but include those things without which the individual cannot comfortably live, and which are useful, and suitable, and necessary, and proper, for his support, use, and comfort in, life, taking into consideration the minor’s status and condition in life. And, where the infant is a married man', he is permitted to furnish his wife with necessaries, and you will take into consideration those things which are necessary for husband and wife as well as for the husband alone, and by the term ‘necessaries’ as applied to the husband is meant such things as the husband should supply to his family, and which are suited to their condition and station in life, their needs and wants, in so far as his ability will permit.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Newberry v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.