Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 SW2D 234 - Dyer v. Sterett

Dyer v. Sterett’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
December 1984
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 1984 · most notably Intermedics, Inc. v. Grady (1984), Johnson v. Buck (1976)

29 state decisions

901952196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re King's Estate · Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Harrison · Davis v. Williams · Wichita Valley Railway Co. v. Williams · Burchfield v. Tanner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that an appellate court after a review of the evidence may have reached a different conclusion from that of the jury or the trial judge sitting without a jury is not sufficient basis for setting aside the verdict or finding. Crawford v. Beaver-Electra-Refining Co., Tex.Civ.App., 273 S.W. 892 ; Canales v. Clopton, Tex.Civ.App., 145 S.W.2d 933 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. G v. G

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.