Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 S.W.2d 322 - Sharp v. Fowler

Sharp v. Fowler’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2008

3 state decisions

20195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co. · Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. Staley Oil Co. · Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. Staley Oil Co. · Hughes v. Gladewater County Line Independent School Dist. · Coffee v. Manly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We conclude, then, that the * * * surface estate and the mineral estate were merged when the * * * [grantor] in their last deed to Cockrell conveyed to him the mineral estate in the 29.7 acres of land and that the reference * * * [to the prior deed] was for the purpose of describing the tract of land conveyed and in no wise limited the estate conveyed by said deeds. 248 S.W.2d 322 , 324 (Tex.Civ. App. 1952). [Emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““50 acres of land situated in Panola County, Texas, and being 20.3 acres of the John Simpson Headright Survey, and 29.7 acres of the T. C. Railway Company No. 13, and being the same land described in a deed from Frost Lumber Industries, Inc. of Texas, to A. D. Cockrell, dated the 4th day of February, A. D. 1935, and of record in Vol. 102, page 462, Deed Records, Panola County, Texas.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.