¶1 ORDER
¶2 William Crust appeals from the trial court’s entry of an interlocutory decree in partition, which ordered the partition and *90 sale of certain real property owned by him and Ingrid Carter as tenants in common. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
¶3 Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).