Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 248 SW3D 96 - SA v. Miller

SA v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wallace v. Van Pelt · Glover v. Michaud · McGrath v. Bowen · George v. McLuckie · State Board of Nursing v. Berry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"To properly raise a constitutional issue, the party must (1) raise the question at the first available opportunity; (2) specifically designate the constitutional provision alleged to have been violated, such as by explicit reference to the article and section, or by quotation from the particular provision; (3) state the facts showing the violation; and (4) preserve the constitutional question throughout for appellate review."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The purpose of this requirement is to give the trial court an opportunity to fairly identify and rule on the issues and to prevent surprise to the opposing party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re AR
  3. “Additionally, a constitutional challenge to a statute must not only have been presented to the trial court, but the trial court must have ruled thereon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re AR

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.