Pink v. Harman

¶1Order denying appellant’s motion for a peremptory order of mandamus directing respondent to file in his office, without the payment of any fee, a certain transcript of judgment affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. No opinion. Young, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Johnston, J., dissent upon the ground that the transcript of judgment is within the exemption of section 416 of the Insurance Law.