¶1In an action to rescind a contract for the purchase of capital stock of defendant corporation, represented by a signed subscription therefor, and to recover the money paid thereon, on the ground that the contract was illegal and void under the provisions of section 359-e of the General Business Law (Art. 23-A, sometimes called the Martin Act), judgment for plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ.
249 A.D. 852
Sajor v. Ampol, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 22, 1937
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1937-01-22
Decided 1937-01-22