¶1 The, only insistence made by petitioner is that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the trial court correctly refused defendant’s requested Charge No. 8. ,
¶2 In our opinion said charge was properly refused upon the ground, aside from any other deficiency, that it omits any reference to- a consideration of the other evidence in the case. Pate v. State, 150 Ala. 10, 43 So. 343.
¶3 Writ denied.