Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 Ark. 258 - Randall v. State

Randall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
January 2002
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2002

20 state decisions

1001970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ware v. State · Pellegrini v. Wolfe · Lee v. State · Fulton v. State · Merritt v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““However, one incarcerated in an institution of the federal government or that of some other jurisdiction must affirmatively request a trial in order to activate the statute and to avail himself of its protection. Lee v. State, 185 Ark. 253 , 47 S.W. 2d 11 (1932). See also, Bedwell v. Circuit Court of Lawrence County, 248 Ark. 866 , 454 S.W. 2d 304 ; Pellegrini v. Wolfe, Judge, 225 Ark. 459 283 S.W. 2d 162 (1955). So, too, a fugitive (escapee) from this jurisdiction, once he has been recaptured and returned to prison, can thereafter claim a reinvestment of his rights under this statute. Merritt v. State, supra, [ 244 Ark. 921 , 428 S.W. 2d 66 (1968)]””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Appellant relies upon Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-1708 (Repl. 1964) which provides: If any person indicted for any offense, and committed to prison, shall not be brought to trial before the end of the second term of the court having jurisdiction of the offense, which shall be held after the finding of such indictment, he shall be discharged so far as relates to the offense for which he was committed, unless the delay shall happen on the application of the prisoner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““. . . we think the spirit of the law is, that for a prisoner to be entitled to his discharge for want of prosecution, he must have placed himself on the record in the attitude of demanding a trial, or at least of resisting postponements.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.