Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 CONN 288 - State v. Stephens

State v. Stephens’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Golding · State v. Hines · State v. Hinckley · State v. Miller · State v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . a defendant can prevail on a claim of constitutional error not preserved at trial only if all of the following conditions are met: . . . (2) the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In the present case, the defendant has failed to meet the second prong of Golding because his claims of instructional impropriety are not of constitutional magnitude”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.