¶1dissenting. I would grant certification on the following issue: Did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the defendant Cedric Edwards, an African-American, failed properly to raise before the trial court his request for an evidential hearing in order to challenge the jury array on the ground that it was derived in an unconstitutional manner resulting in the exclusion of African-Americans?
249 Conn. 903
State v. Edwards
Decided May 12, 1999
Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 1999-05-12
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2004
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1999-05-12
View the full empirical analysis of this case →