Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 F.1d 134 - Horner v. Hamner

Horner v. Hamner’s Empirical Analysis

249 F. 134 · 1918

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2017 · most notably Freshman v. Atkins (1925), Myers v. International Trust Co. (1927)

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

6019181920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Francis v. McNeal · In re Bertenshaw · In re Forbes · In re Blair · In re Pincus

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Filing the schedule in a proceeding in bankruptcy is an ex parte act on the part of the bankrupt, and in that proceeding is a solemn admission which, unless corrected, binds him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.