Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 F.1d 319 - In re Jarmulowsky

In re Jarmulowsky’s Empirical Analysis

249 F. 319 · 1918

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 1936
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1936

7 federal appellate · 1 district ·

60191819201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Swift v. Tyson · Burton v. United States · Railroad Company v. National Bank · St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. Johnston · Cragie v. . Hadley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “deposits of cheeks shall not be drawn against until collected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.