Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

249 F. 348

The Nigretia

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1918.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1918-02-09

<p>Courts <§=>356 — Taking Appeal — Fees—Prepayment.</p> <p>• Act June 12, 1917, c. 27, § 1, 40 Stat. 1571, which, under the caption “United States Courts,” makes an appropriation for fees of clerks, provided that courts of the United States shall be open to seamen without furnishing bond, or prepayment of or making deposit to secure fees or costs, does not apply to the prosecution of appeals in the Circuit Court of Appeals; the clerk of that tribunal having a stated salary, appropriation for which was made by Act March 3, 1917, c. 163, § 1, 39 Stat. 1119.</p> <p><@xsoFar other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1925

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Motion denied · Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1918-02-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Courts <§=>356 — Taking Appeal — Fees—Prepayment.

¶2• Act June 12, 1917, c. 27, § 1, 40 Stat. 1571, which, under the caption “United States Courts,” makes an appropriation for fees of clerks, provided that courts of the United States shall be open to seamen without furnishing bond, or prepayment of or making deposit to secure fees or costs, does not apply to the prosecution of appeals in the Circuit Court of Appeals; the clerk of that tribunal having a stated salary, appropriation for which was made by Act March 3, 1917, c. 163, § 1, 39 Stat. 1119.

¶3<@xsoFar other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes

¶4Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶5Libel by Hassan Abdu and others against the steamship Nigretia, her engines, etc., claimed by the Limerick Steamship Company. There was a decree for claimant, and libelants appeal. On motion by libel-ants for an order directing the clerk of the Circuit Court of Appeals to accept and file the transcript or apostles without the payment of, or security for, any fees whatever.

¶6Motion denied.

¶7Silas B. Axtell, of New York City, for appellants.

¶8Kirlin, Woolsey & Hickox, of New York City, for appellees.

¶9Before WARD, ROGERS, and HOUGH, Circuit Judges.

¶10PER CURIAM.

¶11This motion is renewed because of the passage at the first session of the 65th Congress of the Act of June 12, 1917. This appropriation bill (at 40 Stat. 157), under the subheading or caption “United States Courts,” allots:

“For fees of clerks $215,000: Provided, that courts of the United States shall be open to seamen, without furnishing bond or prepayment of or making deposit to secure fees or costs, for the purpose of entering and prosecuting suit or suits in their own name,” etc.

¶12It is urged that this statute applies to the prosecution of appeals in the Circuit Courts of Appeal; and it is apparently thought that the appropriation covers salary of the clerk of this court. This is a mistake. Clerks of Circuit Courts of Appeal have a stated salary, not dependent on fees, of $3,500 each, and for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1918, appropriation therefor was made by chapter 163 of 1917 (act signed March 3, 1917, and appropriation stated in 39 Stat. 1119).

¶13The statute relied upon by the moving party can refer therefore only to courts other than Circuit Courts of Appeal, and certainly to District Courts, for the clerks of which no provision is made in chapter 163, supra.

¶14It follows that the motion must be denied.

/249/f1d/348 · .json · Public domain