Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 F.2d 10 - Mitchell v. Caldwell

Mitchell v. Caldwell’s Empirical Analysis

249 F.2d 10 · 1957

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
April 1992
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 1992

14 federal appellate ·

11019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co. · Handler v. Thrasher · Porter v. Poindexter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““an employee has carried out his burden if he proves that he has in fact performed work for which he was improperly compensated and if he produces sufficient evidence to show the amount and extent of that work as a matter of just and reasonable inference. The burden then shifts to the employer to come forward with evidence of the precise amount of work performed or with evidence to negative the reasonableness of the inference to be drawn from the employee’s evidence. If the employer fails to produce such evidence, the court may then award damages to the employee, even though the result be only approximate.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'as a matter of just and reasonable inference,' that he worked over forty (40) hours in any week during the time for which plaintiff now claims overtime compensation,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.