Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

249 F.2d 308

Docket No. 15714.

Talon, Inc. v. Union Slide Fasteners, Inc.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1957-11-06

2 counsel of record

Relies on Cutting Room Appliances Corp. v. Empire Cutting Machine Co. · George P. Converse & Co. v. Polaroid Corp. · Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1957-11-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1983

201957196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Lyon & Lyon, Charles G. Lyon, Los Angeles, Cal., McCoy, Greene & Te-Grotenhuis, Cleveland, Ohio, Ralph E. Meech, Meadville, Pa., for appellant.

Allan D. Mockabee, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before ORR, CHAMBERS and BARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This matter came before the Court on motion to dismiss appeal.

¶2

The appeal was taken from a judgment of the District Court denying appellant relief on the ground that his patents were invalid and not infringed. Inasmuch as the denial of injunctive relief is implicit in the judgment of said District Court, the appeal was timely under Section 1292 of Title 28 U.S.C.A. Converse & Co. v. Polaroid Corp., 1 Cir., 1957, 242 F.2d 116; Hook v. George p. Hook & Ackerman, Inc., 3 Cir., 1956, 233 F.2d 180; Cutting Room Appliances Corp. v. Empire Cutting Machine, 2 Cir., 1951, 186 F.2d 997.

¶3

The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

/249/f2d/308 · .json · Public domain