Thomas v. Cassidy’s Empirical Analysis
249 F.2d 91 · 1957
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 7 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably United States v. Collins (1990), State v. Reed (1978)
16 federal appellate · 7 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Manning v. Roanoke & Tar River Railroad · Youmans v. Hanna
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well settled that permission to a nonresident attorney, who has not been admitted to practice in a court, to appear pro hac vice in a case there pending is not a right but a privilege, the granting of which is a matter of grace resting in the sound discretion of the presiding judge. 5 Am.Jur. p. 572; Manning v. Roanoke & T. R. Co., 122 N.C. 824 , 28 S.E. 963 ; Youmans v. Hanna, 35 N.D. 479 , 160 N.W. 705 , 161 N.W. 797 , Ann. Cas. 1917E, 263; Note 24 L.R.A,N.S., 754.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ross v. Reda · Smith v. Brock
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.