Henrikson v. Guzik’s Empirical Analysis
249 F.3d 395 · 2001
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4042 (Prison Camera Reform Act of 2021) · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Stinson v. United States · Christensen v. Harris County · United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is important to 'look to the structure and language of the statute as a whole'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“criminal history as determined by staff in the exercise of their professional judgment includes a conviction for ... `a crime of violence' as defined in section 6.a. or 6.b.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bunn v. Conley“policy statements, agency manuals, and enforcement guidelines, all of which lack the force of law—do not warrant Chevron -style deference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.