Hampton Feedlot, Inc. v. Nixon’s Empirical Analysis
249 F.3d 814 · 2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2020
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co. · Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore. · C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`discrimination' means `differential treatment of in-state and out-of-state economic interests that benefits the former and burdens the latter.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“under rigorous scrutiny, that it has no other means to advance a legitimate local interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“affects the flow of interstate commerce but it does not burden interstate commerce.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.