¶1 Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alvaro Jose Lezcano raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007), petition for cert, filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for *362 summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
249 F. App'x 361
United States v. Lezcano
U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided October 3, 2007
This page is marked noindex.
U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-10-03
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Almendarez-Torres v. United States · United States v. Pineda-Arrellano
Decided 2007-10-03