In Re Ruffalo’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 1968
most recently cited
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Theard v. United States · Selling v. Radford · Estes v. Texas · STANTON v. Embrey, Administrator · People Ex Rel. Karlin v. Culkin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A lawyer may not properly agree with a client that the lawyer shall pay or bear the expenses of litigation. He may in good faith advance expenses as a matter of convenience, but subject to reimbursement.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The members of this court are not in agreement as to whether the facts are as the Board of Commissioners recommended they should be found with respect to some of the other charges against respondent.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The lawyer should not purchase any interest in the subject-matter of the litigation which he is conducting.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.