Brazil v. Janssen Research & Development LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 352 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The heart of this protection is fair warning-the Due Process Clause requires 'that the defendant's conduct and connection with the forum State [be] such that he should reasonably anticipate being haled into court there.' " Id. (alteration in original) (internal quotations and citations omitted). Courts have recognized two types of jurisdiction under the Due Process Clause: "general or all-purpose jurisdiction, and specific or case-linked jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In the absence of clear precedent, I am not prepared to recognize the viability of misrepresentation claims distinct from products liability or failure to warn claims. In my view, misrepresentation claims against a manufacturer properly collapse into the failure to warn claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.