Haynes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 73 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Richardson v. State (1999), Drinkard v. Walker (2006)
3 federal appellate · 73 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · Whalen v. United States · Illinois v. Vitale · Gore v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There are two predominant tests which the courts in this country use in determining what is the `same offense' for double-jeopardy purposes. The majority test is known as the `same evidence' test, and the minority test is known as the `same transaction' test. The majority test, the `same evidence' test, has three variants: a `required evidence' or `elements of the crime' variant; an `alleged evidence' or `allegations of the indictment' variant; and an `actual evidence' variant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“When the same conduct of an accused may establish the commission of more than one crime, the accused . . . may not, however, be convicted of more than one crime if: (1) One crime is included in the other.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“established by the proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Carruth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.