249 Ga. App. 296 - Bell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 240 Ga. App. 783 - Migliore v. State · Aldridge v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia · 225 Ga. App. 222 - State v. Foote
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“OCGA § 16-13-49 (e) permits the forfeiture of property in drug cases involving more than “one gram of cocaine.” In State of Ga. v. Foote,[ 3 ] the State argued that OCGA § 16-13-49 (e) does not require more than one gram of “pure” cocaine to support forfeiture. We disagreed and ruled that the State must demonstrate that a seized sample of cocaine must consist of more than “one gram of cocaine” in order to sustain forfeiture under OCGA § 16-13-49, not simply that the sample, more than a gram, is “positive” for some undetermined amount of cocaine. 4”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.