249 Ga. App. 741 - Upshaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Jackson v. Denno · Garland v. State · Holmes v. State · Corza v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A prospective juror’s doubt as to his or her own impartiality does not demand as a matter of law that he or she be excused for cause. Nor is excusal required when a potential juror expresses reservations about his or her ability to put aside personal experiences. A conclusion on an issue of bias is based on findings of demeanor and credibility which are peculiarly in the trial court’s province, and those findings are to be given deference.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“we do not weigh the evidence or determine the credibility of the witnesses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.