Garrison v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
February 1983
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Marks v. State · Diblee v. State · Kern v. State · Johnson v. State · Sherwood v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When two [2] or more defendants are jointly charged with any offense, whether a felony or a misdemeanor, they shall be tried jointly, unless the court, in its discretion, on the motion of the prosecuting attorney, or of any defendant, or on its own motion, orders separate trials. In making an order or orders for separate trials, the court may order that one or more defendants be each separately tried and the others jointly tried, or it may order that several defendants be jointly tried in one trial and the others jointly tried in another trial or trials, or it may order that each defendant be separately tried. A motion for a separate trial shall be filed at least ten [10] days before the day set for a joint trial, or, if a date less than ten [10] days ahead, is set for a joint trial, then such motion shall be filed within two [2] days after the setting of the case for joint trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State““The rule is now well settled that if an accused be in custody when such accusations of guilt are made in his presence, he is under no duty to deny them and his silence is not to be taken as an admission against him, and it is reversible error to admit such evidence over objection.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lukas v. State““The soundness of the court’s discretion in denying a motion for separate trials is measured by what transpired at the joint trial rather than what was alleged in the motion for separate trials. . . .” 249 Ind. at 209 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.