Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 Ind. 53 - MANSON v. State

MANSON v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
4
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably Williams v. State (1969), Kevin M. Clark v. State of Indiana (2013)

52 state decisions

320196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Idol v. State · Hanger v. State · United States v. Smith · Gwinn v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Probable cause justifying an arrest without a warrant exists where facts and circumstances within the arresting officer’s knowledge or of which he had reasonably trustworthy information, would lead a reasonably prudent person under the conditions at the time to believe a crime had been committed” (our emphasis).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is undisputed that a search of a car without warrant after a lawful arrest of the one in possession is not constitutionally interdicted. [Cases cited omitted.] . . . we may say appellant Manson has no standing to ask that the evidence obtained in the search of the car be suppressed, since she did not own it, and was not in possession or control of it. 25 I.L.E., Search & Seizure, § 5, p. 417.” (Original emphasis.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.