Arterbery v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1975
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dennis v. State · Bielich v. State · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . (1) A felony was committed. (2) Appellant did harbor, conceal, or assist the principal, with intent that he should escape detection, arrest, capture, or punishment. (3) Appellant had knowledge of the crime at the time of giving aid or assistance. (4) Appellant is not related to the person committing the . . . [felony].” Smith v. State (1951), 229 Ind. 546 , 99 N.E.2d 417 . See also, Arterbery v. State (1968), 249 Ind. 541 , 233 N.E.2d 489 ; Bielich v. State (1920), 189 Ind. 127 , 126 N.E. 220 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.