Harris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
97 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently March 2009 · most notably Burton v. State (1973), Brown v. State (1969)
97 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Marshall v. United States · Batchelor v. State · Montos v. State · Wilson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"No person prosecuted for any offense punishable by death, or by confinement in the state prison or county jail, shall be tried unless personally present during the trial."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"The rule requires much more than a mere speculation that an article was read by a juror and of course the law also requires more than a mere speculation that a juror had read the article and was prejudiced thereby. We agree with the appellee's position that if the appellant's contention were adhered to it would be impossible to convict any criminal whose trial was reported in the newspaper. Even if appellant had shown that some member of the jury read the article, it is clear that the reading of a newspaper article pertaining to the case by a juror is not grounds for mistrial, new trial or reversal unless it is shown that the jurors were influenced thereby. United States v. Mitchell, 319 F.2d 402 , (7 Cir.1963); United States v. Carruthers, 152 F.2d 512 , (7 Cir.1946), cert. denied 327 U.S. 787 , 66 S.Ct. 805 , 90 L.Ed. 1014 . See also 31 A.L.R. 417 ." (our emphasis.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““It has been held that this statute is implementive of the Constitution of Indiana, Article 1, § 13, and that the right to be present at trial includes the right to be present in the courtroom at every stage of the proceedings requiring the presence of the jury. Dean v. State (1955), 234 Ind. 568, 572 , 130 N.E.2d 126, 128 . If this right can be waived at all, such waiver should be expressly given by the defendant, Miles v. State (1944), 222 Ind. 312, 319 , 53 N.E.2d 779, 782 .” 249 Ind. 688 , 231 N.E.2d 804 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.