Stebens v. Wilkinson’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2005
4 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Self v. King · Shapleigh Hardware Co. v. Spiro · Koehring ex rel. Martin v. Muemminghoff · Spragins v. McCaleb · Meador v. Dollar Savings Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Paper is none the less payable on demand because it contains a provision as to interest, as where it is payable ‘on demand’ with interest after a specified time, of ‘after maturity,’ with interest ‘annually,’ ‘with interest within six months from date,’ ‘without interest,’ or ‘without interest during the life of the promisor.’ ” (See also Stebens v. Wil kinson (1957), 249 Iowa 365 , 87 N.W.2d 16 , 71 A.L.R.2d 277 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davis v. Dennis“"* * * The fact that notes indicating no time of payment are expressed to be payable with interest annually does not prevent them from being payable on demand. * * * ” (Citing Roberts v. Snow, 27 Neb. 425 , 43 N.W. 241 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davis v. Dennis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.