State v. Peltier’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
2 district · 45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably State v. Voyles (2007), State v. Green (1994)
2 district · 45 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · People v. Chessman · State v. Buggs · State v. Brown · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. Et Al. v. Sawyer; And Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce, v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. Et Al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““any film, photograph, negative, slide, book, magazine or other printed or visual medium or any audio tape recording or any photocopy, video tape, video laser disk, computer hardware, software, floppy disk or any other computer related equipment or computer generated image that contains or incorporates in any manner any film, photograph, negative, photocopy, video tape or video laser disk in which a visual depiction of a child under 18 years of age is shown or heard engaging in sexually explicit conduct . . . .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Errors that do not affirmatively cause prejudice to the substantial rights of a complaining party do not require reversal when substantial justice has been done. Staee v. Bell, 239 Kan. 229, 235 , 718 P.2d 628 (1986). An error of constitutional magnitude cannot be held to be harmless unless the appellate court can declare beyond a reasonable doubt that the error had little, if any, likelihood of changing the results of the trial. State v. White, 246 Kan. 28, 37 , 785 P.2d 950 (1990).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Ferguson““On appeal of a criminal case, the standard in considering the sufficiency of the evidence is whether after a review of all the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the appellate court is convinced that a rational factfinder could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Peltier, 249 Kan. 415 , Syl. ¶ 2, 819 P.2d 628 (1991).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. DeHerrera
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.