Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 LA 609 - State v. Young

State v. Young’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 2018

6 state decisions

20196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hurtado v. People of the State of California · Slaughter-House Cases the Butchers' Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. The Crescent City Live · Harris v. United States · Maxwell v. Dow · Gaines v. State of Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t is not a violation of the Federal Constitution for a State to provide for prosecution of an infamous crime by information when the constitution of the State authorizes that procedure.) (collecting cases). The hearing on defendant's motion to suppress commenced on December 5, 2014. Following testimony from Det. Taillon, the trial court held the matter open and set another date to allow defense counsel to serve Ofc. Betcher. On January 8, 2015, Ofc. Betcher testified and the trial court took the matter under advisement. On January 30, 2015, the trial court ruled on defendant's motion to suppress in open court. Det. Taillon also stated that she was attired in her "police Class B summertime uniform”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “for capital, or otherwise infamous crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.