¶1In re: T. PI. Davidge, Jr., and David D. Davidge applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 189 So.2d 706.
¶2Writ refused. We find no merit m any of the errors complained of.
249 La. 771
Decided November 7, 1966
Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1966-11-07
Relies on Pittman and Matheny v. Davidge
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1966-11-07
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1995
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1In re: T. PI. Davidge, Jr., and David D. Davidge applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 189 So.2d 706.
¶2Writ refused. We find no merit m any of the errors complained of.