Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 Mich. 500 - Crook v. Ford

Crook v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
4
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2015

5 state decisions

20193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McDonald v. Smith · Collins v. Jackson · Hubbard v. Oliver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As a rule there are many factors which induce one to enter into a contract. A fraud results from a fraudulent statement, if the erroneous belief caused by the statement is a material contributing factor in deciding the other party to enter into the contract.” (p. 505.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.