249 Mich. App. 388 - DeRose v. DeRose’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Troxel v. Granville · Reno v. Flores · Parham v. J. R. · McDougall v. Schanz · Frame v. Nehls
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This leads us to the question whether we could and should endeavor to interpret Michigan’s statute in a manner consistent with the constitution. However, such an effort would require a significant, substantive rewriting of the statute. To render the statute constitutional, we would have to read into it requirements that go beyond the text of the statute and do more than simply define the term “best interests of the child” more clearly. We would have to go from the judicial robing room to the legislative cloak room and we decline to do so. In short, the rewriting of the grandparent visitation statute is a task best left for the Legislature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Linder v. Linder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.