249 Mich. App. 668 - Mitchell v. Dougherty’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, when an attorney is retained to represent a client, that representation continues until the attorney is relieved of the obligation by the client or the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[N]o formal discharge by the client is required, and the termination of an attorney-client relationship can be implied by the actions or inactions of the client.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`Retention of an alternate attorney effectively terminates the attorney-client relationship.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.