Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

249 N.C. 131

Boles v. Graham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 29, 1958

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1958-10-29

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1966

4 state decisions

Relies on Holt v. Gregory ex rel. Wallace

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1958-10-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PeR Curiam.

¶1The nonsuit removed the defendants’ objections raised by the first demurrer. They have abandoned their assignment of error based on the refusal of the court to require the plaintiffs to make their complaint more definite. They now present for review only that part of the court’s order overruling the second demurrer interposed in the superior court upon the ground the complaint failed to state a cause of action.

¶2Appeal does not lie from an order overruling a demurrer in any case except where it is interposed as a matter of right for misjoinder of parties and causes. Prior to trial on the merits, an order overruling á demurrer for failure’to state a cause of action can be reviewed only *132by writ of certiorari. Rule 4(a), Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 242 N.C. 766. The defendants are here prematurely.

¶3Appeal Dismissed.

PARKER, J., not sitting.
/249/nc/131 · .json · Public domain