Carmichael v. Scheidt’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 1970
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re Revocation of License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of Wright · Fox v. Scheidt · In Re Revocation of License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of Wright · State v. . McDaniels
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It is mandatory under the provisions of G.S. § 20-17(2) for the Department to revoke the license of any operator or chauffeur upon receiving a record of such operator's or chauffeur's conviction for `driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or a narcotic drug.'" Carmichael v. Scheidt, Comr. of Motor Vehicles, 249 N.C. 472 , 106 S.E.2d 685 (1959).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“There is no right of judicial review when the revocation is mandatory pursuant to the provisions of G.S. § 20-17.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the period of revocation shall be as provided in G.S. § 20-19.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.