249 N.C. App. 322 - Mannise v. Harrell’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Tom Togs, Inc. v. Ben Elias Industries Corp. · Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc. · 138 N.C. App. 612 - Bruggeman v. Meditrust Acquisition Co. · 169 N.C. App. 690 - Banc of America Securities LLC v. Evergreen International Aviation, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The writ of certiorari may be issued in appropriate circumstances by either appellate court to permit review of the judgments and orders of trial tribunals when the right to prosecute an appeal has been lost by failure to take timely action[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Zimmerman“An entered order did not exist when Defendant filed notice of appeal on 7 October 2015.... Defendant has failed to take timely action to perfect his appeal pursuant to Appellate Rule 3, and his appeal is not properly before this Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Zimmerman“a person applying for a job, a professional license, a government position, admission to an academic institution, or the like, may be asked about whether he or she has been the subject of a domestic violence protective order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martin v. Martin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.