249 N.C. App. 620 - In re: K.P. & C.P.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 141 N.C. App. 475 - In Re Gleisner · State v. Grundler · 156 N.C. App. 655 - In Re Harton · 185 N.C. App. 337 - In Re THT · 156 N.C. App. 398 - In Re Ivey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only if: (1) all parties are present or represented by counsel, who is present and authorized to consent; (2) the juvenile is represented by counsel; and (3) the court makes sufficient findings of fact. Id . at ----, 790 S.E.2d at 747 (quoting In re Shaw , 152 N.C.App. 126 , 129, 566 S.E.2d 744 , 746 (2002) ) (emphasis added). The statute upon which respondent-mother relies, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-805, is titled”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that a consent agreement had been reached for adjudication or that a consent order had been drafted. ... Specifically, neither of the parties' attorneys nor the trial court ever stated that respondent was consenting to the adjudication of her children as neglected and dependent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he allegations in a petition alleging that a juvenile is abused, neglected, or dependent shall be proved by clear and convincing evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.