Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 N.C. App. 672 - State v. Ross

249 N.C. App. 672 - State v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Odom · State v. Black · State v. Cummings · State v. Brown · State v. Tucker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Our review of this issue on appeal is for plain error, as Defendant failed to object to the jury instruction at trial on the basis that it varied materially from the indictment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]f the indictment's allegations do not conform to the 'equivalent material aspects of the jury charge,' this discrepancy is considered a fatal variance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[D]efendant must be convicted, if convicted at all, of the particular offense charged in the bill of indictment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.