Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 Neb. 282 - Biddlecome v. Conrad

Biddlecome v. Conrad’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
May 1999
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. State, Dept. of Motor Vehicles · Hunter v. Morse · Cockle v. Cockle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Plain error exists where there is an error, plainly evident from the record but . not complained of at trial, which prejudicially affects a substantial right of a litigant and is of such a nature that to leave it uncorrected would cause a miscarriage of justice or result in damage to the integrity, reputation, and fairness of the judicial process.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the restrictions on a motorist's ability to obtain employment driving privileges contained in § 60-6,206(2).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.