Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 P.3d 264 - PRAVAT v. State

PRAVAT v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
4
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

38 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 25 U.S.C. § 1903 (§ 4 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978) · 25 U.S.C. § 1912 (§ 102 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978)

Relies on A.A. v. State, Department of Family & Youth Services · Maisy W. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services · L.G. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services · Barbara P. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services · Brynna B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Passive efforts are where a plan is drawn up and the client must develop his or her own resources towards bringing it to fruition. In contrast, [a]ctive efforts [are] where the state caseworker takes the client through the steps of the plan rather than requiring that the plan be performed on its own. For instance, rather than requiring that a client find a job, acquire new housing, and terminate a relationship with what is perceived to be a boyfriend who is a bad influence, [ICWA] would require that the caseworker help the client develop job and parenting skills necessary to retain custody of her child.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Findings of fact are clearly erroneous if a review of the entire record in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below leaves us with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “failed, within a reasonable time, to remedy the conduct or conditions ... that place the child in substantial risk so that returning the child to the parent would place the child at substantial risk of physical or mental injury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.