Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 So. 2d 754 - Freimuth v. State

249 So. 2d 754 - Freimuth v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1972
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 44 U.S.C. § 1507

Relies on Howard v. State · Witherspoon v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not such error as calls for a reversal or retrial. A retrial would not result in a different judgment, as the State would simply produce the Federal Register [US Registry of Drugs] in court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “and any other drug to which the drug abuse laws of the United States apply ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.