Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 So. 2d 82 - Papp v. State

249 So. 2d 82 - Papp v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1975
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 229 So. 2d 833 - City of Gainesville v. Thomas · 246 So. 2d 172 - Favors v. City of Tampa · Moore v. Joseph · Citizens Casualty Co. v. Oaks · Schumacher v. Keck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" While timely filing of notice of appeal is jurisdictional, the timely deposit of the required filing fee is not. We do not mean to imply by this that the deposit of the fee is not mandatory for we are of the opinion that it is. However, in circumstances where the clerk of the appropriate court is satisfied to accept a notice of appeal without simultaneously collecting the filing fee, then the subsequent deposit of the fee after the running of the appeal time limit will not affect the jurisdiction of the appellate court." (Emphasis supplied)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.