Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

249 S.W.3d 240

Reyes v. Watson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 2008

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2008-04-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2014

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-04-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 The defendant, Clinton L. Watson, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County sustaining and thereby granting full force and effect to the plaintiffs’ foreign judgment against the defendants, dismissing the defendants’ pending motions for lack of prosecution, and ordering execution to proceed on certain real property owned by Mr. Watson’s co-defendant. 1 Finding no error, we affirm.

¶3 An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

¶4 The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(5). 2

1

¶5 . Mr. Watson appears to argue on behalf of all of the defendants. However, Mr. Watson’s co-defendants are not parties to this appeal.

2

¶6 . The plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the appeal based on Mr. Watson’s alleged lack of standing is denied.

/249/sw3d/240 · .json · Public domain