Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 249 S.W.3d 461 - Stukes v. Bachmeyer

Stukes v. Bachmeyer’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 26th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Cain v. Bain · Dow Chemical Co. v. Francis · Croucher v. Croucher · Gulf Paving Co. v. Lofstedt · Brown v. Bank of Galveston, National Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Trespasser" means one who enters on the property of another without having consent of the owner. To constitute a trespass, entry upon another’s property need not be in person but may be made by causing or permitting a thing to cross the boundary of the premises. Every unauthorized entry upon land of another is a trespass and the intent or motive prompting the trespass is immaterial. Did [Brazos] trespass causing damage to [Watson’s] property on the date of the fire that is the basis of this suit?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) it owns or has a lawful right to possess real property; (2) the defendant physically, intentionally, and voluntarily entered the land; and (3) the defendant's trespass caused damage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.