Debs v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
249 U.S. 211 · 1919
Citation profile
92 federal appellate · 18 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 194 later decisions (41 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary Same (1925), Branzburg v. Hayes (1972)
92 federal appellate · 18 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schenck v. United States · Frohwerk v. United States · Ruthenberg v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 194 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“■“'to willfully make or convey false reports or false statements, with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States, to promote the success of its enemies during the present war, and willfully cause and attempt to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, and refusal of duty in the military or naval, forces of the United States, and to willfully obstruct the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, to the injury of the service and of the United States.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The main theme of the speech was Socialism, its growth, and a prophecy of its ultimate success. With that we have nothing to do, but if a part or the manifest intent of the more general utterances was to encourage those present to obstruct the recruiting service, and if in passages such encouragement was directly given, the immunity of the general theme may not be enough to protect the speech.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the words used had as their natural tendency and reasonably probable effect to obstruct the recruiting service,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.